A new version of Cineversity has been launched. This legacy site and its tutorials will remain accessible for a limited transition period

Visit the New Cineversity
   
2 of 2
2
Physical Renderer DOF Question (Merged Threads)
Posted: 15 May 2015 04:49 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 16 ]  
Administrator
Avatar
Total Posts:  12043
Joined  2011-03-04

… any chance to set the parameters of the provided scene file [post #3] to yours? I really want to have that solved for you.

Enjoy your weekend

 Signature 

Dr. Sassi V. Sassmannshausen Ph.D.
Cinema 4D Mentor since 2004
Maxon Master Trainer, VES, DCS

Photography For C4D Artists: 200 Free Tutorials.
https://www.youtube.com/user/DrSassiLA/playlists

NEW:

NEW: Cineversity [CV4]

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 May 2015 12:21 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 17 ]  
Total Posts:  11
Joined  2015-04-30

Hi,

It turned out that this problem occurs with either mip or sat sampling but if I use any of the other sampling methods the results make more sense.

I now have a problem with team render which I will post as a seperate question.

Thanks for your help

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 May 2015 01:15 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 18 ]  
Administrator
Avatar
Total Posts:  12043
Joined  2011-03-04

You’re welcome, Geoff.

Thanks for the feedback. MIP (initially) or SAT, is an option to avoid background flickering. No idea how you could have gotten a clear image at any time, if these setting were set, and perhaps too high. My tip: if you want to have the texture blurred overall, do it once to the linked image (a copy of course) otherwise you pay with render-time.

I hope replicating the problem has helped to filter out the area that caused the un-wanted result. I do not asked to be right, just to collect data what has worked.

Team render, Besides that 16.050 had updates about it, Rick also provided a new addendum to his series about problems after updating.

To speed up the process, as render-farms vary heavily, you might get instantly in contact with the support.

Have a great weekend


P.S.: I have made tests with the specification you mentioned. Well, hints—more or less. To get the MIP/Sat setting to compromise the Alpha channel you need to get really high values. As the Alpha channel is independent from other channels (in MIP/SAT/etc) settings, I don’t really get the idea to dial that value up as well. Again, how that shows up in DOF renderings in focus and then completely blurry is not clear to me. Values of around 100% (!) really destroy the transparency of the Alpha texture (if I set it for tests in that way) in my example. Hence my initial input to check if the transparency area has really black (zero) values. It can’t—of course not. So the initial question/headline is misleading, just to clear that point for every reader of this thread.

However—I’m glad that theme has been solved and the problem source has been spotted. :o)

 Signature 

Dr. Sassi V. Sassmannshausen Ph.D.
Cinema 4D Mentor since 2004
Maxon Master Trainer, VES, DCS

Photography For C4D Artists: 200 Free Tutorials.
https://www.youtube.com/user/DrSassiLA/playlists

NEW:

NEW: Cineversity [CV4]

Profile
 
 
   
2 of 2
2